If Google is Banned, WSJ loses 25% Traffic!
A little while back we posted an article on Rupert Murdochs ridiculous threat to ban Google from the wall street journal (WSJ). Just how ridiculous is that threat? Well, someone took the time to crunch the numbers:
Whenever Rupert Murdoch goes back to his home country of Australia, he loosens up and says things to the press (usually his own outlets) that he might not say in the U.S. Of course, everyone in the U.S. picks up on it and it becomes a big story, as it did today after Murdoch told his own Sky News that he might start blocking Google and other search engines from giving searchers full access to articles on the Wall Street Journal’s website, WSJ.com. Asked whether he realized that Google was sending his news site a ton of traffic, Murdoch responded, “”We’d rather have fewer people coming to our Websites, but paying.”
If Murdoch wants fewer people coming to the WSJ.com and other news sites he controls, blocking Google from indexing those sites is the perfect way to achieve that goal. Just over 25 percent of the WSJ.com’s traffic comes directly from Google or Google news, according to estimates by Hitwise. About 12 percent of that comes from Google News, and another 15 percent from Google search directly.
About 44 percent of visitors to the WSJ.com are new to the site, so Google is doing a good job of …
Read the full article at TechCrunch
Yes Mr.Rupert Bigtalk, ban google – if you dare.
Related posts:
This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.